
保聯企業股份有限公司
ManufacturingBottleneck
1.Increased demand leads to a lack of real-time responsiveness in on-site scheduling and capacity deployment.
2.Shipment scheduling far beyond historical levels overloads internal capacity. Delays in outsourcing and material arrival further contribute to order delays.
3.Delivery dates are frequently changing amidst a significant increase in demand.
4.Unrealistic capacity assumptions result in unreliable delivery dates.
5.On-time shipment confirmation is only possible just before container loading.
6.Inquiries and material expediting are time-consuming and challenging.
7.Reduced on-time delivery results in lost revenue.
8.Manual scheduling hinders effective management.
DigiHua IntelligentSolution Implementation
Procurement Follow-Up Procedures
Challenge
LRP assumes infinite capacity, yet actual order demand and production start times deviate from LRP projections. Checking “real” future material availability via the WF system is very difficult and time-consuming. High order volumes and frequent delivery date changes make outsourcing and procurement follow-up extremely difficult.
Countermeasures
- Alerts for pending materials and quantities should be linked to customer orders and their delivery urgency.
- These alerts should connect to relevant purchase orders for supplier follow-up.
- Material usage should be prioritized by order due date, removing manual order checks.
- Inventory status should be readily apparent, removing the need for extra interpretation.
- Part-order associations and part usage should be clearly displayed, removing the need for additional searches.
Production Scheduling
Challenge
- Although past experience allows for initial production planning and line sequencing, volatile customer demand necessitates continuous on-site schedule adjustments by supervisors, resulting in high effort and low real-time visibility.
- The risk of missing work orders is present, and discovery of these omissions typically occurs too late for effective corrective action.
Countermeasures
- Synchronized shipping and shop floor schedules improve sequencing accuracy and shipping efficiency.
- APS’s quick search identifies material allocation problems.
- Assembly scheduling prevents missed work orders, improving information flow and reducing risk.
- Real-time work order inventory tracking is available for finished goods, limbs, and fletching.
- Scheduling recommendations adapt to dynamic customer demand.
- Fast report filtering speeds up anomaly detection (missing work orders, allocation issues, etc.).
- Better production sequencing enables more accurate material preparation and minimizes on-site waste (space, changeovers).
POE LANG ENTERPRISE
Rough-Cut Capacity Planning (RCCP)
Core MechanismMindset
Visualized data
Greater accuracy
Simplified processes
Smoother workflows
Intuitive operation
Improved proficiency
ProjectProgram Effectiveness
- Previously, a single material shortage inquiry took approximately 2 hours. After implementing APS, only 10 minutes are required for manual review, with daily updates!
- Previously, scheduling took an average of over 6 hours per instance. After implementing APS, only 30 minutes are required for data processing, with daily updates!